This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep. Mindspillage(spill yours?) 17:58, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Very important company. JuntungWu 14:00, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Household word in investments. Their "style boxes" are used universally. Their star ratings are frequently cited (particularly in ads by companies with good ratings). As well known as, say Value Line. Current article is a not-impossibly-bad stub. Would be well worth expanding. Does not read as promotional language to me. Dpbsmith(talk) 01:43, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Definitely worth keeping, though the page is extremely sparse. I actually came to learn how the rating system worked (1-3? 1-5?) but found there to be no info as of yet. Crick22 10:00, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.